On 5 October 2017, the Gujarat High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a lower court’s decision to uphold a closure report by a special investigation team that looked into the massacre at Gulburg Society during the riots in Gujarat in early 2002. The Supreme Court constituted the SIT in 2008, in a case arising out of a petition filed by Zakia Jafri, the wife of Ehsan Jafri—a veteran Congress politician who was among 69 Muslim residents of Gulburg Society who were killed by a mob of Hindu attackers.Jafri’s petition accused 63 persons, including Narendra Modi, then the chief minister of the state, and other senior state government officials, of being complicit in the violence, and alleged that the state machinery had remained deliberately inactive.
In 2012, the SIT submitted a closure report to the apex court, stating thatthe allegations against Modi “are not made out.” The report noted: “the allegation about the inaction on part of the State Govt. as well as police department is … not established.” In 2014, Jafri approached the Gujarat High Court after the lower court rejected her petition challenging the SIT report. While dismissing her appeal against the acceptance of the SIT report, however, the court held that Jafri was free to move a petition demanding a fresh investigation. According to the Indian Express, the high court notedthat, “The trial court has self-limited itself in saying that further investigation, in this case, can’t be ordered.” It continued: “This order of lower court deserves interference.”
In “Emperor Uncrowned,” his 2012 story on the rise of Narendra Modi, Vinod K Jose, the executive editor of The Caravan, reported on the massacre. Jafri recounted to Jose that, as the mob surrounded Gulburg Society, Ehsan called several Gujarat state officials for help—including Modi.