The denial of rape by soldiers in Kashmir by the likes of Shekhar Gupta illustrates the impunity enjoyed by the Armed Forces

08 April 2016
For us, as Kashmiri women, Shekhar Gupta’s denial of rapes committed by the soldiers in Kashmir is illustrative of a long line of violent attempts that aim to protect the image of the Indian state.
AP Photo/Mukhtar Khan
For us, as Kashmiri women, Shekhar Gupta’s denial of rapes committed by the soldiers in Kashmir is illustrative of a long line of violent attempts that aim to protect the image of the Indian state.
AP Photo/Mukhtar Khan

On 8 March 2016, celebrated internationally as Women’s Day, Kanhaiya Kumar, the president of the Jawaharlal Nehru University Students Union, gave a speech in the university’s campus. Close to end of his speech, Kumar also asserted that he would not stay silent on the issue of human rights violations. “While we have a lot of respect for the soldiers in the armed forces,” he said, “we will still say that rape of women is committed by security forces in Kashmir.” Though the audience greeted his statement with applause, several politicians and sections of the media reprimanded Kumar for saying this. The Bharatiya Janata Party Yuva Morcha (the youth wing of the BJP) filed a complaint against Kumar for uttering “poisonous words against the Indian army.” This sentiment was echoed by an anchor at the Zee News channel, who accused Kumar of “speaking like a separatist.”

Among the critics of Kumar was also the journalist Shekhar Gupta. In a tweet, Gupta said that Kumar was “losing it,” and that by saying that the army rapes women in Kashmir, he was employing the “stereotypes of the rough 90s.” Gupta then asked Kumar to “read newspapers Comrade.” In doing so, he betrayed not only ignorance and prejudice, but also shed light on an attitude often adopted by much of India’s supposed intelligentsia: it is so enamoured by the valour and gallantry associated with the armed forces that it fails to acknowledge, or even hear of, any crimes committed by their members. In conflict areas such as Kashmir, the Indian armed forces have used severe forms of intimidation—torture, extrajudicial killings, disappearances, kidnapping and rape—to curb resistance. Of all the tactics in their arsenal, army personnel have often turned to sexual violence as the most convenient form of retribution for rebellion. In these areas, rape is a potent weapon used to discourage resistance and humiliate the population. The intelligentsia and much of the rest of the population of India, have, through their blind spot, propagated a system of impunity that saves the armed forces from ever having to answer for their crimes. For us, as Kashmiri women, Gupta’s statement is illustrative of a long line of violent attempts that aim to protect the image of the Indian state.

The rapes committed by members of the Indian armed forces are well documented through independent investigations of national and international enquiries by agencies, such as Asia Watch, the Asia wing of the international organisation Human Rights Watch and Physicians for Human Rights, a non-profit organisation. Although several rapes committed by the members of the armed forces are not reported in areas such as Kashmir due to the fear of reprisals and the associated stigma, there are reported cases that prove this a reality even today.

Essar Batool is a professional social worker, petitioner in the re-investigation of Kunan-Poshpora mass rape case. She is the co-author of the book ‘Do You Remember Kunan-Poshpora?’.

Natasha Rather is a professional social worker, petitioner in the re-investigation of Kunan-Poshpora mass rape case. She is the co-author of the book ‘Do You Remember Kunan-Poshpora?’.

Keywords: Kashmir Indian Army rape Sexual Assault
COMMENT