THE INDIAN STATE has become defiantly lawless in pursuit of its open hostility against a section of its citizens. Since 2019, bulldozers have evolved into a marker of this celebratory state lawlessness. These now feverishly popular icons symbolise the muscular and unapologetically partisan exercise of state power, in both the discourse and practice of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Their rampant use signals to the citizenry, the opposition and the courts the rejection of both constitutional governance and secular democracy.
Successive state governments in several BJP-ruled states have targeted mostly Muslim citizens with bulldozers, razing their properties, with rarely even a pretence to due legal process let alone constitutional fairness. The atmosphere is typically festive, as buildings are brought down by bulldozers, often cheered on by onlookers and television media, and hailed by elected leaders as acts of righteous retribution.
In sending out bulldozers, authorities seem to be cynically unimpeded by the imperatives of constitutional rights and the rule of law. There is, after all, no law in any Indian statute book that empowers the state to destroy the properties of a person simply on the suspicion of committing a crime. As AP Shah, a retired chief justice of the Delhi High Court affirmed to the news portal Coda, “Mere alleged involvement in criminal activity cannot ever be grounds for demolition of property.” Moreover, in order to conclude that a person has committed a crime, the constitution and law established an elaborate procedure protecting the rights of the accused. This, too, has been casually set aside.
Despite their recourse to lawless bulldozer “justice,” the executive has rarely been restrained by the country’s judiciary. On some occasions, the courts have stayed demolitions, but only after significant damage had been wrecked. In a rare instance, in August this year, two judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court asked if “an exercise of ethnic cleansing is being conducted by the State?” after four days of demolition of properties owned by Muslim citizens of Haryana’s Nuh district. The judges noted that the home minister declared that the demolitions were part of “ilaaj,” or cure, even before the state government had completed its probe into the communal violence preceding the demolitions.